In re the Compulsory Judicial Settlement of the Estate of Slater
166 A.D. 934
Opinion
The order is sufficiently clear. If the meeting is not cahed at the instance of the appellant, she is not restrained from voting, if she be otherwise so entitled, upon the stock. In due course the decree of the surrogate upon the accounting may be entered by the time of the March meeting. Motion denied, without costs. Present—Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton, Rich and Putnam, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re the Compulsory Judicial Settlement of the Estate of Slater, 166 A.D. 934 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).
166 A.D. 934 (In re the Compulsory Judicial Settlement of the Estate of Slater) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.