In re the Compulsory Judicial Settlement of the Account of Gilman

166 A.D. 893
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re the Compulsory Judicial Settlement of the Account of Gilman. Read the opinion of the Court — 175 A.D. 185

Opinion

Order of the Surrogate’s Court of [894]*894Kings county affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Compulsory Judicial Settlement of the Account of Gilman, 166 A.D. 893 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

166 A.D. 893 (In re the Compulsory Judicial Settlement of the Account of Gilman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.