In Re the Compulsory Accounting of Gilman
108 N.E. 1095, 214 N.Y. 666, 1915 N.Y. LEXIS 1370
Opinion
Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Hiscock, Chase, Collin, Hogan, Miller and Cardozo, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re the Compulsory Accounting of Gilman, 108 N.E. 1095, 214 N.Y. 666, 1915 N.Y. LEXIS 1370 (N.Y. 1915).
108 N.E. 1095 (In Re the Compulsory Accounting of Gilman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re the Estate of Gilman
167 N.E. 437 (New York Court of Appeals, 1929)