In re the Complaint of American River Transportation Co.

909 F. Supp. 685, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19416, 1995 WL 769102
CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri
DecidedNovember 17, 1995
DocketNo. 4:94 CV 1005 DDN
StatusPublished

This text of 909 F. Supp. 685 (In re the Complaint of American River Transportation Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Complaint of American River Transportation Co., 909 F. Supp. 685, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19416, 1995 WL 769102 (E.D. Mo. 1995).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

NOCE, United States Magistrate Judge.

This action is before the Court sua sponte for reconsideration of the findings of the Court, made orally on the record on November 16, 1995, concerning the counterclaim of petitioner American River Transportation Company against claimant Gary Holbert for salvage damages. On that date, also orally on the record, the Court entered judgment on partial findings in favor of petitioner and against all claimants, pursuant to Rule 52(c), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Thereafter, the Court considered further evidence and found that claimant Gary Holbert was liable to petitioner for salvage damages in the amount of $500.00. The parties consented to the exercise of authority by a United States Magistrate Judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(3).

In this case the Court denied the claims of Gary Holbert and George Holbert against petitioner for the loss of society damages resulting from the death of their father, Albert Holbert. At 2:45 p.m., on October 10, 1993, 53-year-old Gary Holbert began an ill-begotten camping trip with his 82-year-old father south on the Mississippi River from Alton, Illinois, intending to reach New Madrid, Missouri, in an overloaded motor boat. The river conditions were very dangerous and their boat was swamped by the wake of a commercial vessel, soon after they passed the St. Louis Arch on the day they began the trip. Gary Holbert climbed onto the exposed capsized portion of the bow of the motor boat [687]*687and his father hung onto the bow line. All floated down the cold Mississippi River for almost an hour until they were spotted by persons on the bank.

The Coast Guard was notified and broadcast a report of their peril. Shortly after 6:00 p.m., from their station at Reidy Terminal at mile 175 on the Upper Mississippi River, without any legal obligation to do so, the crews of the MV Jill Carolyn and the MV Andrea Leigh, two barge tugboats owned by petitioner American River Transportation Company, quickly brought their boats out onto the river to render assistance. The Andrea Leigh, a larger boat but slower and less maneuverable than the Jill Carolyn, moved aside to allow the Jill Carolyn room to attempt a rescue. At that time the Holberts and their capsized, partially submerged boat were in cold water, being swept in a strong southwest current which set in toward a group of fleeted barges at Reidy Terminal. With less than a minute of time available to effect a rescue, Jeffrey Terrell, the captain of the Jill Carolyn, with great skill maneuvered the Jill Carolyn across the front of the fleeted barges toward the river bank, made a 180 degree turn and then a 45 degree turn upriver to position his boat between the nearby barges and the imperilled Holberts. The Jill Carolyn then was in great peril of being swept into the barges, with the likelihood of being capsized and the crew drowned.

In the rescue effort, as the stern of the Jill Carolyn was falling off toward the barges, deckhand Randy Miller twice threw Gary Holbert a buoyant line which Holbert ultimately grabbed. Deckhand Eric Hampton threw a line to Albert Holbert. However, Albert, probably due to shock, did not respond or grab the line. He and the capsized motor boat were swept past the Jill Carolyn and under the fleeted barges. Miller was unable to pull Gary Holbert onto the deck of the Jill Carolyn by himself. Instead, at great peril to himself, he grabbed Holbert’s life jacket and held on until Hampton assisted him in bringing Holbert onto the deck. In this fashion, Gary Holbert’s life was saved.

Gary Holbert was quickly transferred to the Andrea Leigh and the Jill Carolyn then went in search of Albert Holbert. The deckhands of the Jill Carolyn, again at great peril to themselves, quickly loosened the moorings of the fleeted barges to allow the recovery of Albert Holbert. He was soon found, having surfaced -with the motor boat on the downriver side of the fleeted barges. He and Gary Holbert were transferred to emergency medical personnel on shore. Albert Holbert died from drowning, after being exposed to the cold river water for an extended period of time and after being swept under the fleeted barges; Gary Holbert needed no medical attention. He immediately returned to his home without comment to his rescuers. After its investigation, the United States Coast Guard issued a commendation award to the captain and crew of the Jill Carolyn for their heroic efforts in saving Gary Holbert and in attempting to save Albert Holbert.

This judicial action was initially commenced in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, when Gary Holbert and George Hol-bert, the surviving sons of Albert Holbert, sought monetary damages from petitioner, and from the captain of the Jill Carolyn personally, for the alleged wrongful death of Albert Holbert. Petitioner was granted in-junctive relief from that suit by this Court under the Limitation of Liability Act, 46 U.S.C.App. §§ 181-195. Thereafter, during a non-jury trial, this Court granted judgment upon partial findings to the petitioner on the claims of Gary Holbert and George Holbert, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52(c), following the close of the claimants’ ease-in-chief. The Court found and concluded that claimants had not sustained their burden of proving that the petitioner and its personnel acted negligently or that the claimants had suffered any monetary damages. Petitioner then continued with evidence in support of its claim for salvage damages.

Salvage awards are an important factor in preserving property and maintaining navigable riverways as courses for safe commerce and travel. B.V. Bureau Wijsmuller v. United States, 702 F.2d 333, 337 (2d Cir.1983).

In order to accomplish these purposes courts of admiralty do not view salvage awards therefore “merely as pay, on the principal of quantum meruit, or as a remu[688]*688neration pro opere et labore, but as a reward given for perilous services, voluntarily rendered, and as an inducement to seamen and others to embark in such undertakings to save life and property.” The Blackwall, 77 U.S. (10 Wall.) 1, 14, 19 L.Ed. 870 (1870); see [3A M. Norris, Benedict on Admiralty § 235 (6th ed.1980)]. For these reasons courts sitting in admiralty are liberal in fixing awards. The Felix, 62 F. [620, 622 (E.D.Pa.1894).]

B.V. Bureau Wijsmuller, 702 F.2d at 338. Recently, salvage damages were made available for the rescue of life as well as property. 46 U.S.C. § 729 (1976).

Petitioner is entitled to salvage damages, if it proved that Gary Holbert and his boat were in marine peril, that petitioner rendered him rescue service voluntarily and not because of any legal obligation, and that this rescue service was successful. B.V. Bureau Wijsmuller, 702 F.2d at 338. Each of these elements was proven by petitioner.

In this case, orally on the record at the conclusion of the trial, the Court found that petitioner was entitled to $500.00, based solely upon the Court’s finding of the value of the salved Holbert motor boat.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
909 F. Supp. 685, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19416, 1995 WL 769102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-complaint-of-american-river-transportation-co-moed-1995.