In re the Complaint made against Elmborg

570 P.2d 1374, 223 Kan. 13, 1977 Kan. LEXIS 370
CourtSupreme Court of Kansas
DecidedNovember 4, 1977
DocketNo. 49,461; Bar Docket No. 5270
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 570 P.2d 1374 (In re the Complaint made against Elmborg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Complaint made against Elmborg, 570 P.2d 1374, 223 Kan. 13, 1977 Kan. LEXIS 370 (kan 1977).

Opinion

Whereas, In a proceeding conducted by the State Board of Law Examiners to inquire into the complaint of alleged professional misconduct by John R. Elmborg, and

Whereas, Following a full hearing as to such complaint, the State Board of Law Examiners found that John R. Elmborg, Blue Rapids, Kansas, in several conservatorship estates failed, neglected and refused to file accountings or failed to furnish as a part of an accounting information required by the court as a condition to approval of accountings, and by reason thereof violated the following rules of the Code of Professional Responsibility: DR 1-102 (A) (6), DR 6-101 (A) (3), and DR 9-102 (B) (3) and (4) (214 Kan. lxxv, Ixxxyii, and xcii), and

Whereas, The State Board of Law Examiners made a written recommendation to this Court that said John R. Elmborg be disciplined by “Suspension” from the practice of law, as provided by Rule No. 203 (a) (2) (220 Kan. xxviii [Adv. Sheet No. 2]), for an indefinite period, and

Whereas, In accordance with Rule 213 (c) (220 Kan. xxxiii [Adv. Sheet No. 2]), a copy of the report, findings and recommendations of the Board was mailed to respondent on September 8, 1977, along with a citation directing him to file with the Court either a statement that he did not wish to file exceptions, or his exceptions to the report, and

Whereas, Since more than twenty days passed after the citation was mailed, and no response was received, said John R. Elmborg was notified to appear before this Court on November 4, 1977, for the imposition of discipline, pursuant to Rule 213 (d) (220 Kan. xxxiii [Adv. Sheet No. 2]), and

Whereas, On the 4th day of November, 1977, the matter came on for hearing before the Court, the State of Kansas appearing by Philip A. Harley, assistant attorney general, and respondent appearing not, and the Court, after consideration of the record and being fully advised in the premises, finds the recom[14]*14mendation of the State Board of Law Examiners should be accepted.

It is, therefore, by the Court Considered, Ordered and Adjudged that the said John R. Elmborg be and he is hereby disciplined by suspension from the practice of law for an indefinite period, as of the 4th day of November, 1977, and that he pay the costs of the proceeding. It is further ordered that this Order of Suspension be published in the official Kansas Reports.

By Order of the Court, dated this 4th day of November, 1977.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Elmborg
739 P.2d 444 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
570 P.2d 1374, 223 Kan. 13, 1977 Kan. LEXIS 370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-complaint-made-against-elmborg-kan-1977.