In re the Complaint Against Simpson

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re the Complaint Against Simpson

159 A. 401, 10 N.J. Misc. 307, 1932 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 251

DecidedMarch 1, 1932

StatusPublished

This text of 159 A. 401 (In re the Complaint Against Simpson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Complaint Against Simpson, 159 A. 401, 10 N.J. Misc. 307, 1932 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 251 (N.J. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this matter a complaint was made against Charles E. S. Simpson, an attorney and eounselor-at-law of this state, charging unethical and illegal conduct upon his part. That complaint was duly referred to the state board of bar examiners for investigation and report. Their report disclosed that due hearing was accorded and that they found and reported Charles E. S. Simpson “guilty of unprofessional conduct; that he is unfit to continue a member of the bar, and recommend that he be disbarred and his name struck from the rolls of attorneys and counselors of this state.”

Due examination and consideration of the matters laid before us at the argument on this motion for confirmation of the report results in the conclusion that the report must be confirmed and that said Simpson be disbarred and his name stricken from the rolls of attorneys and counselors of this state, and it accordingly is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

In this matter a complaint was made against Charles E. S. Simpson, an attorney and eounselor-at-law of this state, charging unethical and illegal conduct upon his part. That complaint was duly referred to the state board of bar examiners for investigation and report. Their report disclosed that due hearing was accorded and that they found and reported Charles E. S. Simpson “guilty of unprofessional conduct; that he is unfit to continue a member of the bar, and recommend that he be disbarred and his name struck from the rolls of attorneys and counselors of this state.”

Due examination and consideration of the matters laid before us at the argument on this motion for confirmation of the report results in the conclusion that the report must be confirmed and that said Simpson be disbarred and his name stricken from the rolls of attorneys and counselors of this state, and it accordingly is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

159 A. 401, 10 N.J. Misc. 307, 1932 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-complaint-against-simpson-nj-1932.