in Re: The Commitment of Mark Hanson
This text of in Re: The Commitment of Mark Hanson (in Re: The Commitment of Mark Hanson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-18-00190-CV
IN RE: THE COMMITMENT OF MARK HANSON
On Appeal from the 87th District Court Freestone County, Texas Trial Court No. 16-090B, Honorable Patrick H. Simmons, Presiding
July 6, 2018
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.
Appellant Mark Hanson, proceeding pro se, filed a notice of appeal in the Tenth
Court of Appeals without paying the filing fee. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1. By letter on
April 25, 2018, the Tenth Court of Appeals directed Hanson to pay the filing fee within ten
days. The appeal was later transferred to this Court by the Supreme Court of Texas. See
TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001 (West 2013).
On May 15, 2018, Hanson filed a letter with this Court requesting permission to
proceed without payment of court costs. By letter on June 8, 2018, we denied Hanson’s
request as he had not filed a statement of inability to afford payment of court costs in the trial court or appellate court as required by Appellate Rule 20.1. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145;
TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1. We directed Hanson to pay the filing fee or file a statement of
inability to afford payment of court costs with the clerk of this Court by June 22, 2018, and
enclosed a copy of the relevant form with our letter. We notified him that the appeal was
subject to dismissal if he did not comply by this deadline. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).
To date, Hanson has not paid the filing fee or filed any response to our June 8
letter. The Rules of Appellate Procedure require a party who is not excused by law from
paying costs to pay the required fees. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5. Accordingly, the appeal is
dismissed because of Hanson’s failure to comply with a requirement of the appellate rules
and an order of this Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).
Per Curiam
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: The Commitment of Mark Hanson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-commitment-of-mark-hanson-texapp-2018.