In re the Commissioner of Social Services

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Commissioner of Social Services

224 A.D.2d 687, 638 N.Y.S.2d 915, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1841

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 26, 1996·Published

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the father appeals from a dispositional order of the Family Court, Kings County (Lubow, J.), dated March 20, 1994, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court dated March 22, 1993, inter alia, found that the father had neglected the child and ordered supervised visitation between the child and the father. The appeal brings up for review the fact-finding order dated March 22, 1993.

Ordered that the dispositional order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We agree with the Family Court’s determination that the subject child is a neglected child within the meaning of Family Court Act § 1012 (f) (see, Matter of Baby Boy E., 187 AD2d 512). Furthermore, the dispositional order is in the best interests of the child (see, Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. [Trudy I.] v Leona W., 192 AD2d 602). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Copertino and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the father appeals from a dispositional order of the Family Court, Kings County (Lubow, J.), dated March 20, 1994, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court dated March 22, 1993, inter alia, found that the father had neglected the child and ordered supervised visitation between the child and the father. The appeal brings up for review the fact-finding order dated March 22, 1993.

Ordered that the dispositional order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We agree with the Family Court’s determination that the subject child is a neglected child within the meaning of Family Court Act § 1012 (f) (see, Matter of Baby Boy E., 187 AD2d 512). Furthermore, the dispositional order is in the best interests of the child (see, Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. [Trudy I.] v Leona W., 192 AD2d 602). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Copertino and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

In re the Commissioner of Social Services, 224 A.D.2d 687, 638 N.Y.S.2d 915, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1841 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

224 A.D.2d 687 (In re the Commissioner of Social Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related