In re the Commissioner of Social Services

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Commissioner of Social Services

224 A.D.2d 687, 638 N.Y.S.2d 915, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1841

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 26, 1996

StatusPublished

This text of 224 A.D.2d 687 (In re the Commissioner of Social Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Commissioner of Social Services, 224 A.D.2d 687, 638 N.Y.S.2d 915, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1841 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the father appeals from a dispositional order of the Family Court, Kings County (Lubow, J.), dated March 20, 1994, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court dated March 22, 1993, inter alia, found that the father had neglected the child and ordered supervised visitation between the child and the father. The appeal brings up for review the fact-finding order dated March 22, 1993.

Ordered that the dispositional order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We agree with the Family Court’s determination that the subject child is a neglected child within the meaning of Family Court Act § 1012 (f) (see, Matter of Baby Boy E., 187 AD2d 512). Furthermore, the dispositional order is in the best interests of the child (see, Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. [Trudy I.] v Leona W., 192 AD2d 602). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Copertino and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the father appeals from a dispositional order of the Family Court, Kings County (Lubow, J.), dated March 20, 1994, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court dated March 22, 1993, inter alia, found that the father had neglected the child and ordered supervised visitation between the child and the father. The appeal brings up for review the fact-finding order dated March 22, 1993.

Ordered that the dispositional order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We agree with the Family Court’s determination that the subject child is a neglected child within the meaning of Family Court Act § 1012 (f) (see, Matter of Baby Boy E., 187 AD2d 512). Furthermore, the dispositional order is in the best interests of the child (see, Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. [Trudy I.] v Leona W., 192 AD2d 602). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Copertino and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

224 A.D.2d 687, 638 N.Y.S.2d 915, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1841, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-commissioner-of-social-services-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack