In re the Collection of the Goods of Patullo
This text of 1 Tuck. Surr. 106 (In re the Collection of the Goods of Patullo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A second instrument was then tendered as a bond on appeal, which was made to Hugh Perrigan, who was only one of the parties interested in maintaining the order of the Surrogate; and the Surrogate refused to approve or file this also, and returned it. (5 Abbott's Digest, pp. 141-2, § 66.)
A third instrument was tendered as a bond on appeal, after the expiration of thirty days from the entry of the order appealed from. This, also, the Surrogate declined to approve and file, and returned. (5 Abbott's Digest, p. 143, § 80.)
The Public Administrator thereupon abandoned the appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Tuck. Surr. 106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-collection-of-the-goods-of-patullo-nysurct-1870.