In re the Claim of Zografos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Zografos

50 A.D.2d 700, 375 N.Y.S.2d 448, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12558

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 26, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 50 A.D.2d 700 (In re the Claim of Zografos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Zografos, 50 A.D.2d 700, 375 N.Y.S.2d 448, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12558 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 13, 1975, which held claimant ineligible to receive benefits effective January 20, 1975 on the ground that he was not available for employment. Claimant, a full-time student in a college, was denied benefits by the board, which found that he was not available for employment during the period in issue since he did not make active, diligent and sincere efforts to obtain employment. The factual finding of the board that claimant was not available for employment is supported by substantial evidence. Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Greenblott, Koreman, Main and.Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 13, 1975, which held claimant ineligible to receive benefits effective January 20, 1975 on the ground that he was not available for employment. Claimant, a full-time student in a college, was denied benefits by the board, which found that he was not available for employment during the period in issue since he did not make active, diligent and sincere efforts to obtain employment. The factual finding of the board that claimant was not available for employment is supported by substantial evidence. Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Greenblott, Koreman, Main and.Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.D.2d 700, 375 N.Y.S.2d 448, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12558, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-zografos-nyappdiv-1975.