In re the Claim of Zerrillo

91 A.D.3d 1011, 935 N.Y.2d 916
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 5, 2012·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

[1012] It is well settled that quitting in response to criticism by a supervisor or in anticipation of discharge does not constitute good cause for leaving one’s employment (see Matter of Follett [Commissioner of Labor], 87 AD3d 1233, 1234 [2011]; Matter of Hull [Commissioner of Labor], 77 AD3d 1012, 1013 [2010]; Matter of Santiago [Commissioner of Labor], 308 AD2d 674 [2003]; Matter of Bradley [Hudacs], 190 AD2d 949, 950 [1993]). Based upon this record, we find that the Board’s decision that claimant voluntarily left her employment without good cause is supported by substantial evidence and must be upheld (see Matter of Seiglar [Commissioner of Labor], 51 AD3d 1118, 1118 [2008]; Matter of Santiago [Commissioner of Labor], 308 AD2d at 674).

Spain, J.E, Lahtinen, Kavanagh, McCarthy and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Claim of Zerrillo, 91 A.D.3d 1011, 935 N.Y.2d 916 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

91 A.D.3d 1011 (In re the Claim of Zerrillo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Walters (Commissioner of Labor)
2017 NY Slip Op 5497 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Matter of Franklin (Commr. of Labor)
141 A.D.3d 1067 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Matter of Kanter (Commr. of Labor)
138 A.D.3d 1283 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
MatterofMarkaj[Commr.ofLabor]
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
In re the Claim of Markaj
119 A.D.3d 1267 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)