In re the Claim of Wright

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Wright

27 A.D.2d 776, 277 N.Y.S.2d 73, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4898

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 10, 1967

StatusPublished

This text of 27 A.D.2d 776 (In re the Claim of Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Wright, 27 A.D.2d 776, 277 N.Y.S.2d 73, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4898 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum by the Court. Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board disqualifying claimant from benefits on the ground that she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. The board chose to accept the employer’s statement that his criticism of claimant’s work was not a dismissal nor so intended; and found that claimant’s returning to work the following day (failing, however, to return on the next succeding working day) belied her assertion that she had been discharged. We are without authority to disturb this purely factual determination. Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur in a memorandum by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum by the Court. Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board disqualifying claimant from benefits on the ground that she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. The board chose to accept the employer’s statement that his criticism of claimant’s work was not a dismissal nor so intended; and found that claimant’s returning to work the following day (failing, however, to return on the next succeding working day) belied her assertion that she had been discharged. We are without authority to disturb this purely factual determination. Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur in a memorandum by the court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 A.D.2d 776, 277 N.Y.S.2d 73, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4898, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-wright-nyappdiv-1967.