In re the Claim of Wolff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Wolff

252 A.D.2d 714, 675 N.Y.S.2d 918, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8170

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 9, 1998

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 252 A.D.2d 714 (In re the Claim of Wolff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Wolff, 252 A.D.2d 714, 675 N.Y.S.2d 918, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8170 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 11, 1997, which denied claimant’s application for reconsideration of a prior decision ruling that she was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because she was not available for employment.

Claimant’s application for unemployment insurance benefits was denied by the local unemployment insurance office on the ground that she was not available for employment. The [715]*715Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ultimately ruled that claimant’s subsequent request for a hearing was untimely and reaffirmed the initial determination that she was ineligible to receive benefits. Upon granting claimant’s application to reopen and reconsider the merits, the Board adhered to its prior decision. When claimant again applied to reopen the decision, the Board denied the application, giving rise to this appeal. Whether to grant an application for reconsideration is a decision left to the sound discretion of the Board and it will not be disturbed absent an abuse of discretion (see, Matter of Trincere [Sweeney], 235 AD2d 904). We find no basis in the record for concluding that the Board abused its discretion in denying the application and the decision is, accordingly, affirmed.

Mikoll, J. P., White, Peters, Spain and Graffeo, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 11, 1997, which denied claimant’s application for reconsideration of a prior decision ruling that she was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because she was not available for employment.

Claimant’s application for unemployment insurance benefits was denied by the local unemployment insurance office on the ground that she was not available for employment. The [715]*715Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ultimately ruled that claimant’s subsequent request for a hearing was untimely and reaffirmed the initial determination that she was ineligible to receive benefits. Upon granting claimant’s application to reopen and reconsider the merits, the Board adhered to its prior decision. When claimant again applied to reopen the decision, the Board denied the application, giving rise to this appeal. Whether to grant an application for reconsideration is a decision left to the sound discretion of the Board and it will not be disturbed absent an abuse of discretion (see, Matter of Trincere [Sweeney], 235 AD2d 904). We find no basis in the record for concluding that the Board abused its discretion in denying the application and the decision is, accordingly, affirmed.

Mikoll, J. P., White, Peters, Spain and Graffeo, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

252 A.D.2d 714, 675 N.Y.S.2d 918, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-wolff-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack