In re the Claim of Wolf

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Wolf

25 A.D.2d 576, 267 N.Y.S.2d 496, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5007

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 8, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 25 A.D.2d 576 (In re the Claim of Wolf) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Wolf, 25 A.D.2d 576, 267 N.Y.S.2d 496, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5007 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum by the Court. Claimant appeals from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board denying benefits on the ground that she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. The factual issue as to whether the claimant “walked off the job” or was fired as the result of her alleged tardiness was resolved by the board by the acceptance of the “ employer’s version ”. A reading of the record affords substantial evidence to sustain the decision. The court, under the circumstances, is limited in its review as questions of fact and credibility are within the sole fact-finding province of the board. Decision affirmed, without costs.

Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum by the Court. Claimant appeals from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board denying benefits on the ground that she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. The factual issue as to whether the claimant “walked off the job” or was fired as the result of her alleged tardiness was resolved by the board by the acceptance of the “ employer’s version ”. A reading of the record affords substantial evidence to sustain the decision. The court, under the circumstances, is limited in its review as questions of fact and credibility are within the sole fact-finding province of the board. Decision affirmed, without costs.

Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 A.D.2d 576, 267 N.Y.S.2d 496, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5007, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-wolf-nyappdiv-1966.