In re the Claim of Williams

30 A.D.2d 583, 290 N.Y.S.2d 251, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3962
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 20, 1968
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 30 A.D.2d 583 (In re the Claim of Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Claim of Williams, 30 A.D.2d 583, 290 N.Y.S.2d 251, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3962 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Opinion

Aulisi, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, dated July 20, 1966. Claimant is a musician and was the leader of a group of four musicians known as a combo. He was employed by appellant for about eight months. Appellant paid claimant one sum for the four musicians and made no withholdings. The personnel of the combo was discussed before hiring by appellant and claimant and when for any reason appellant was dissatisfied with one of the combo, claimant was informed and the person was replaced. The combo was hired to play rock and roll music and whenever they deviated from this, appellant directed claimant to play only rock and roll. The combo was also required to furnish music for talent night programs when, in effect, amateur performers auditioned for later appearances at appellant’s cabaret. Claimant was initially denied unemployment insurance benefits on the ground he did not have sufficient weeks of covered employment. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board found that claimant was not an independent agent as claimed by appellant, but an employee and, therefore, he was entitled to credit for covered employment while employed by appellant. The record here contains substantial evidence to sustain the board’s determination that claimant was subject to appellant’s supervision, direction and control sufficient to negate the claim of independent contractor and to establish an employer-employee relationship. Decision affirmed, with costs to respondent Williams. Gibson, P. J., Reynolds, Aulisi, Staley, Jr., and Gabrielli, JJ., concur in memorandum by Aulisi, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Samson
62 A.D.2d 459 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 A.D.2d 583, 290 N.Y.S.2d 251, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3962, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-williams-nyappdiv-1968.