In re the Claim of White

50 A.D.2d 1019, 377 N.Y.S.2d 296, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12010

Opinion

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 22, 1974, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining an initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits on the ground he voluntarily left his employment without good cause by provoking his discharge (Labor Law, § 593, subd 3). There is substantial evidence in the instant record to support the board’s factual findings even accepting, arguendo, claimant’s argument that the testimony of the supervisor should not be accepted because of his failure to have an opportunity for cross-examination (cf. Matter of Harper [Levine], 41 AD2d 975). The board’s determination must, therefore, be affirmed. Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Sweeney, Koreman, Larkin and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Claim of White, 50 A.D.2d 1019, 377 N.Y.S.2d 296, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12010 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

50 A.D.2d 1019 (In re the Claim of White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Claim of Harper
41 A.D.2d 975 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1973)