In re the Claim of Weinstein
This text of 53 A.D.2d 949 (In re the Claim of Weinstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board fully considered the claimant’s factual allegations, and issues of credibility are for the board. The decision is supported by substantial evidence (Matter of Greenfield [Levine], 38 AD2d 643, mot for lv to app den 31 NY2d 641) and the appeal has no substantial merit.. Decision affirmed, without costs. No opinion (CPLR 5522). Greenblott, J. P., Kane, Larkin, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
53 A.D.2d 949, 385 N.Y.S.2d 415, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15742, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-weinstein-nyappdiv-1976.