In Re the Claim of Watz
This text of 387 N.E.2d 611 (In Re the Claim of Watz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
We agree that there is not substantial evidence in . the record to sustain the determination of the appeal board that the relationship between claimant and Equitable Life Assurance Society was that of employee-employer during the period January 1, 1974 through December 1, 1974.
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Fuchsberg concur in memorandum.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
387 N.E.2d 611, 46 N.Y.2d 876, 414 N.Y.S.2d 680, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 1827, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-watz-ny-1979.