In re the Claim of Ward

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Ward

209 A.D.2d 808, 618 N.Y.S.2d 605, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11114

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 10, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 209 A.D.2d 808 (In re the Claim of Ward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Ward, 209 A.D.2d 808, 618 N.Y.S.2d 605, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11114 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 19, 1993, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling that [809]*809claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

The sole purpose for reopening the Board’s prior decision in claimant’s case was to determine if there had been compliance with the procedural safeguards enunciated by the consent judgment of Municipal Labor Comm. v Sitkin (1983 WL 44294 [US Dist Ct, SD NY, Aug. 1, 1983]). Having found no procedural violations, the Board adhered to its prior decision ruling that claimant voluntarily left his job without good cause. Claimant’s contentions of procedural deficiencies are unsupported by the record. The Board’s decision must therefore be upheld.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, White and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 19, 1993, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling that [809]*809claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

The sole purpose for reopening the Board’s prior decision in claimant’s case was to determine if there had been compliance with the procedural safeguards enunciated by the consent judgment of Municipal Labor Comm. v Sitkin (1983 WL 44294 [US Dist Ct, SD NY, Aug. 1, 1983]). Having found no procedural violations, the Board adhered to its prior decision ruling that claimant voluntarily left his job without good cause. Claimant’s contentions of procedural deficiencies are unsupported by the record. The Board’s decision must therefore be upheld.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, White and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

209 A.D.2d 808, 618 N.Y.S.2d 605, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-ward-nyappdiv-1994.