In re the Claim of Wallenhorst

209 A.D.2d 809, 618 N.Y.S.2d 154, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11102
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 10, 1994·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 23, 1993, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Claimant, a union member, testified that he quit his job as an electrician for the employer, a nonunion contractor, because he anticipated being recalled to union work and was concerned about losing union privileges. The evidence reveals, however, that claimant had no basis for concern over union sanctions. Moreover, the employer testified that there was continuing work for claimant had he not quit. Claimant’s contentions to the contrary merely presented a credibility question for the Board to resolve. Finally, the overpayment of benefits is recoverable pursuant to Labor Law § 597 (4).

Mikoll, J. P., Crew III, Casey and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Claim of Wallenhorst, 209 A.D.2d 809, 618 N.Y.S.2d 154, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11102 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

209 A.D.2d 809 (In re the Claim of Wallenhorst) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Claim of Kennedy
294 A.D.2d 700 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
In re the Claim of Gillette
264 A.D.2d 877 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)