In re the Claim of Villanueva

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Villanueva

50 A.D.2d 642, 375 N.Y.S.2d 56, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12461

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 6, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 50 A.D.2d 642 (In re the Claim of Villanueva) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Villanueva, 50 A.D.2d 642, 375 N.Y.S.2d 56, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12461 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 8, 1975, which disqualified claimant from receiving benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. The board found that claimant, with knowledge that his employer furnished transportation to its plant, refused to avail himself of it because he disliked the operator of the vehicle and that claimant did not wish to utilize the railroad because it was too expensive. In our view, there is substantial evidence in the record to sustain the board’s determination that such reasons were personal and noncompelling and constituted a voluntary leaving without good cause. Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Koreman and Larkin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 8, 1975, which disqualified claimant from receiving benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. The board found that claimant, with knowledge that his employer furnished transportation to its plant, refused to avail himself of it because he disliked the operator of the vehicle and that claimant did not wish to utilize the railroad because it was too expensive. In our view, there is substantial evidence in the record to sustain the board’s determination that such reasons were personal and noncompelling and constituted a voluntary leaving without good cause. Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Koreman and Larkin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.D.2d 642, 375 N.Y.S.2d 56, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-villanueva-nyappdiv-1975.