In re the Claim of Van Such

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Van Such

50 A.D.2d 956, 375 N.Y.S.2d 688, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11901

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 4, 1975

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 50 A.D.2d 956 (In re the Claim of Van Such) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Van Such, 50 A.D.2d 956, 375 N.Y.S.2d 688, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11901 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinions

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 26, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits effective August 16, 1974, upon the ground that the claimant lost his employment through his own misconduct. Admittedly, the claimant failed to complete a vitally important assignment and, yet, signed the prescribed form indicating that he had performed the assignment. Such behavior, under the present circumstances, constituted misconduct, and the board’s decision should be affirmed. Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Greenblott, Main and Reynolds, JJ., concur; Koreman, J., dissents and votes to reverse in the following memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 26, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits effective August 16, 1974, upon the ground that the claimant lost his employment through his own misconduct. Admittedly, the claimant failed to complete a vitally important assignment and, yet, signed the prescribed form indicating that he had performed the assignment. Such behavior, under the present circumstances, constituted misconduct, and the board’s decision should be affirmed. Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Greenblott, Main and Reynolds, JJ., concur; Koreman, J., dissents and votes to reverse in the following memorandum.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.D.2d 956, 375 N.Y.S.2d 688, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-van-such-nyappdiv-1975.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack