In re the Claim of Tyk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Tyk

220 A.D.2d 907, 632 N.Y.S.2d 681, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10172

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 19, 1995

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 220 A.D.2d 907 (In re the Claim of Tyk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Tyk, 220 A.D.2d 907, 632 N.Y.S.2d 681, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10172 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 5, 1994, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.

Claimant was the president and a 50% shareholder of a wholesale clothing company. Claimant closed the company as [908]*908the result of declining sales. The Board denied his claim for unemployment insurance benefits, finding that he was not totally unemployed because he participated in and stood to gain financially from the winding down of the business. We find that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision. The collection of accounts receivable to pay outstanding debts was clearly beneficial to claimant. In addition, there was evidence that during the winding down of affairs the company maintained a bank account, telephone service and a post office box, and that claimant received the mail and signed checks for corporate expenses. Under these circumstances, substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision that claimant was not totally unemployed (see, Matter of Ranee [Hudacs], 196 AD2d 930).

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Her cure, Crew III and White, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 5, 1994, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.

Claimant was the president and a 50% shareholder of a wholesale clothing company. Claimant closed the company as [908]*908the result of declining sales. The Board denied his claim for unemployment insurance benefits, finding that he was not totally unemployed because he participated in and stood to gain financially from the winding down of the business. We find that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision. The collection of accounts receivable to pay outstanding debts was clearly beneficial to claimant. In addition, there was evidence that during the winding down of affairs the company maintained a bank account, telephone service and a post office box, and that claimant received the mail and signed checks for corporate expenses. Under these circumstances, substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision that claimant was not totally unemployed (see, Matter of Ranee [Hudacs], 196 AD2d 930).

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Her cure, Crew III and White, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

220 A.D.2d 907, 632 N.Y.S.2d 681, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-tyk-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack