In re the Claim of Tyk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Tyk

205 A.D.2d 820, 615 N.Y.S.2d 301, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5877

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 2, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 205 A.D.2d 820 (In re the Claim of Tyk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Tyk, 205 A.D.2d 820, 615 N.Y.S.2d 301, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5877 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 22, 1993, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance [821]*821benefits because he failed to comply with registration requirements.

Claimant taught business courses at a college from March 1, 1990 through July 25, 1992. Although claimant failed to file a claim for unemployment insurance benefits promptly when his employment ended, he sought to show that this failure should be excused based on misinformation allegedly given to him by the local office. We find no reason to disturb the Board’s finding that claimant’s excuse was not credible. Accordingly, substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision that claimant’s failure to comply with registration requirements was without good cause.

Cardona, P. J., Crew III, Casey, Weiss and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 22, 1993, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance [821]*821benefits because he failed to comply with registration requirements.

Claimant taught business courses at a college from March 1, 1990 through July 25, 1992. Although claimant failed to file a claim for unemployment insurance benefits promptly when his employment ended, he sought to show that this failure should be excused based on misinformation allegedly given to him by the local office. We find no reason to disturb the Board’s finding that claimant’s excuse was not credible. Accordingly, substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision that claimant’s failure to comply with registration requirements was without good cause.

Cardona, P. J., Crew III, Casey, Weiss and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

205 A.D.2d 820, 615 N.Y.S.2d 301, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5877, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-tyk-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack