In re the Claim of Tyk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Tyk

205 A.D.2d 820, 615 N.Y.S.2d 301, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5877

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 2, 1994·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 22, 1993, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance [821] benefits because he failed to comply with registration requirements.

Claimant taught business courses at a college from March 1, 1990 through July 25, 1992. Although claimant failed to file a claim for unemployment insurance benefits promptly when his employment ended, he sought to show that this failure should be excused based on misinformation allegedly given to him by the local office. We find no reason to disturb the Board’s finding that claimant’s excuse was not credible. Accordingly, substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision that claimant’s failure to comply with registration requirements was without good cause.

Cardona, P. J., Crew III, Casey, Weiss and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 22, 1993, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance [821] benefits because he failed to comply with registration requirements.

Claimant taught business courses at a college from March 1, 1990 through July 25, 1992. Although claimant failed to file a claim for unemployment insurance benefits promptly when his employment ended, he sought to show that this failure should be excused based on misinformation allegedly given to him by the local office. We find no reason to disturb the Board’s finding that claimant’s excuse was not credible. Accordingly, substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision that claimant’s failure to comply with registration requirements was without good cause.

Cardona, P. J., Crew III, Casey, Weiss and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

In re the Claim of Tyk, 205 A.D.2d 820, 615 N.Y.S.2d 301, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5877 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

205 A.D.2d 820 (In re the Claim of Tyk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related