In re the Claim of Tucker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Tucker

209 A.D.2d 810, 618 N.Y.S.2d 480, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11124

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 10, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 209 A.D.2d 810 (In re the Claim of Tucker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Tucker, 209 A.D.2d 810, 618 N.Y.S.2d 480, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11124 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 14, 1993, [811]*811which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he refused employment without good cause.

Claimant worked for the employer, a temporary employment agency, on an assignment basis. The Board found that claimant failed to accept a one-day assignment from the employer for which he was qualified because he was waiting to hear from another employer, and that this constitutes a failure to accept employment without good cause. Substantial evidence supports this decision and we therefore affirm.

Cardona, P. J., White, Casey and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 14, 1993, [811]*811which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he refused employment without good cause.

Claimant worked for the employer, a temporary employment agency, on an assignment basis. The Board found that claimant failed to accept a one-day assignment from the employer for which he was qualified because he was waiting to hear from another employer, and that this constitutes a failure to accept employment without good cause. Substantial evidence supports this decision and we therefore affirm.

Cardona, P. J., White, Casey and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

209 A.D.2d 810, 618 N.Y.S.2d 480, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-tucker-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack