In re the Claim of Tremblay

24 A.D.2d 658, 261 N.Y.S.2d 205, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3641
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 8, 1965·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Memorandum by the Court.

This is an appeal by an employer and its compensation carrier from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board discharging the Fund for Reopened Cases and charging the carrier with responsibility for the payment of the award. Claimant’s assignment to lighter work at the same wages, amply demonstrated by the record, constituted an advance payment of compensation tolling the three-year time limitation of section 25-a of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. (Matter of Dorfer v. Summerhays & Sons Corp., 286 App. Div. 1053, mot. for lv. to app. den. 309 N. Y. 1032; Matter of Golomb v. City of New York, 8 A D 2d 874.) Decision affirmed, with costs to the Fund for Reopened Cases. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Taylor and Hamm, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Claim of Tremblay, 24 A.D.2d 658, 261 N.Y.S.2d 205, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3641 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

24 A.D.2d 658 (In re the Claim of Tremblay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Iannaci v. Independent Cement Corp.
66 A.D.3d 1194 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Claim of Foglia v. New York City Housing Authority
132 A.D.2d 762 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)