In re the Claim of Titus

220 A.D.2d 919, 632 N.Y.S.2d 319, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10165
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 19, 1995·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 31, 1994, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant was terminated from his employment as the manager of a check cashing company for violating company rules regarding check cashing procedures. In particular, claimant approved the cashing of a check in excess of $1,000 without obtaining his supervisor’s authorization and without contacting the maker of the check. Because the check had been stolen, [920] claimant’s employer suffered a financial loss. Although claimant testified that he did not approve the cashing of the check, there was contrary testimony that it was claimant who gave the approval. Inasmuch as it was the Board’s function to evaluate this conflicting testimony, we find that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, White, Yesawich Jr. and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Claim of Titus, 220 A.D.2d 919, 632 N.Y.S.2d 319, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10165 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

220 A.D.2d 919 (In re the Claim of Titus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Claim of Washington
304 A.D.2d 896 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
In re the Claim of Guerrerio
269 A.D.2d 659 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
In re the Claim of Hartman
257 A.D.2d 878 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
In re the Claim of Knibbs
256 A.D.2d 961 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)