In re the Claim of Terry

23 A.D.3d 727, 802 N.Y.S.2d 637
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 3, 2005
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 23 A.D.3d 727 (In re the Claim of Terry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Claim of Terry, 23 A.D.3d 727, 802 N.Y.S.2d 637 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Ap[728]*728peal Board, filed June 4, 2004, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Substantial evidence supports the determination of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board denying claimant’s application for unemployment insurance benefits because she lost her employment as an administrative secretary due to disqualifying misconduct. The record establishes that claimant was terminated from her employment due to her belligerent and threatening behavior toward her supervisor. It is well settled that threatening a supervisor (see Matter of Wynne [Commissioner of Labor], 16 AD3d 755 [2005]; Matter of Ramos [Commissioner of Labor], 306 AD2d 791 [2003]) or engaging in insubordinate behavior (see Matter of Montanye [Commissioner of Labor], 10 AD3d 830 [2004]) can constitute disqualifying misconduct, particularly where, as here, a claimant has previously been admonished regarding such contentious behavior (see Matter of Sona [Commissioner of Labor], 13 AD3d 799 [2004]). To the extent that claimant offered a different version of the event leading to her discharge, this presented a credibility issue for the Board to resolve (see Matter of Allen [Commissioner of Labor], 5 AD3d 845, 846 [2004]; Matter of Shaw [S’il Vous Plait Message Mgt. Ctr. Ltd.—Commissioner of Labor], 302 AD2d 655 [2003]).

Cardona, P.J, Crew III, Peters, Carpinello and Mugglin, JJ, concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Colindres
91 A.D.3d 991 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
In re the Claim of Auguste
61 A.D.3d 1242 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
In re the Claim of Piervencenti
39 A.D.3d 1108 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
In re Gigi
37 A.D.3d 894 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 A.D.3d 727, 802 N.Y.S.2d 637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-terry-nyappdiv-2005.