In re the Claim of Tenors

244 A.D.2d 749, 664 N.Y.S.2d 667, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11735
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 20, 1997·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 14, 1996, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.

While collecting unemployment insurance benefits, claimant failed to report his involvement in his father’s taxi business to the local unemployment insurance office. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board subsequently found him ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits on the ground that he was not totally unemployed. In addition, the Board charged him with a recoverable overpayment of benefits and assessed a forfeiture penalty of 292 benefit days upon finding that he had made willful false statements to obtain benefits.

[750] We reject claimant’s contention that there is no evidence to support the Board’s finding that claimant made willful false statements to obtain benefits. The record reveals that claimant was an authorized signatory on the business checking account and routinely wrote checks on its behalf. Although claimant maintains that he was not involved in the business while he was unemployed and wrote checks only to help his ailing father, the record discloses that claimant signed yearly Federal income tax returns for the corporation, was a 50% shareholder and was listed as its president on another official document. This, coupled with claimant’s admitted failure to read the information booklet distributed by the local office, constitutes substantial evidence supporting the Board’s conclusion that claimant made willful false statements to obtain benefits (see, Matter of Hilburger [Mudacs], 183 AD2d 1016). Consequently, we find no reason to disturb the Board’s decision.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, White, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Claim of Tenors, 244 A.D.2d 749, 664 N.Y.S.2d 667, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11735 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

244 A.D.2d 749 (In re the Claim of Tenors) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Claim of Warner
278 A.D.2d 653 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
In re the Claim of Kabel
267 A.D.2d 696 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
In re the Claim of Sherman
267 A.D.2d 568 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
In re the Claim of Perkins
256 A.D.2d 679 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
In re the Claim of Secord
255 A.D.2d 680 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
In re the Claim of Basile
252 A.D.2d 644 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
In re the Claim of Halper
251 A.D.2d 875 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)