In re the Claim of Teller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Teller

212 A.D.2d 925, 622 N.Y.S.2d 628, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1599

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 16, 1995

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 212 A.D.2d 925 (In re the Claim of Teller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Teller, 212 A.D.2d 925, 622 N.Y.S.2d 628, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1599 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 4, 1993, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

The Board concluded that claimant, a production manager and operator, left his job because he did not wish to transfer to the employer’s location and that none of the reasons [926]*926claimant gave for refusing to transfer constituted good cause. The Board found that while claimant’s salary remained the same, no one received a pay raise and his hours remained basically unchanged. It also found that while the commuting distance was increased it was not unreasonable and that, contrary to claimant’s contentions, he would not be supervising a greater number of workers and that overtime was not mandatory. Based on the Board’s findings and the record before us, there is substantial evidence to support its conclusion that claimant voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Claimant’s brief on appeal raises factual issues which were for the Board to resolve.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Mercure, Casey and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 4, 1993, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

The Board concluded that claimant, a production manager and operator, left his job because he did not wish to transfer to the employer’s location and that none of the reasons [926]*926claimant gave for refusing to transfer constituted good cause. The Board found that while claimant’s salary remained the same, no one received a pay raise and his hours remained basically unchanged. It also found that while the commuting distance was increased it was not unreasonable and that, contrary to claimant’s contentions, he would not be supervising a greater number of workers and that overtime was not mandatory. Based on the Board’s findings and the record before us, there is substantial evidence to support its conclusion that claimant voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Claimant’s brief on appeal raises factual issues which were for the Board to resolve.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Mercure, Casey and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

212 A.D.2d 925, 622 N.Y.S.2d 628, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1599, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-teller-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack