In re the Claim of Tanella

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Tanella

221 A.D.2d 795, 633 N.Y.S.2d 433, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11789

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 16, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 221 A.D.2d 795 (In re the Claim of Tanella) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Tanella, 221 A.D.2d 795, 633 N.Y.S.2d 433, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11789 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 6, 1995, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Claimant worked as an assistant manager in the billing department of a medical office. Claimant left her employment after her new supervisor refused to schedule her work hours to accommodate her school schedule. The Board denied claimant’s application for unemployment insurance benefits on the basis that she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. We find that this decision is supported by substantial evidence in the record. There is no dispute that the reason claimant left her job was because her new supervisor refused to allow her to work hours which accommodated her school schedule. Because this is not a justifiable reason for claimant to have left her employment, we find no reason to disturb the Board’s decision.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Mercure, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 6, 1995, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Claimant worked as an assistant manager in the billing department of a medical office. Claimant left her employment after her new supervisor refused to schedule her work hours to accommodate her school schedule. The Board denied claimant’s application for unemployment insurance benefits on the basis that she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. We find that this decision is supported by substantial evidence in the record. There is no dispute that the reason claimant left her job was because her new supervisor refused to allow her to work hours which accommodated her school schedule. Because this is not a justifiable reason for claimant to have left her employment, we find no reason to disturb the Board’s decision.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Mercure, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

221 A.D.2d 795, 633 N.Y.S.2d 433, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11789, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-tanella-nyappdiv-1995.