In re the Claim of Takaha

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Takaha

53 A.D.2d 711, 384 N.Y.S.2d 64, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13479

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 3, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 53 A.D.2d 711 (In re the Claim of Takaha) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Takaha, 53 A.D.2d 711, 384 N.Y.S.2d 64, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13479 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 27, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining an initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits effective December 2, 1974 on the ground that he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Claimant, a houseman, testified that he was overworked. He presented no medical evidence, however, that the work was too arduous for him. Moreover, he also stated that he left his employment because he was going to Japan for a trip. Furthermore, he admitted that he did not complain to his employer that the work was too hard for him. Thus, substantial evidence supports the finding of the board. Decision affirmed, without costs. Koreman, P. J., Greenblott, Kane, Larkin and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 27, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining an initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits effective December 2, 1974 on the ground that he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Claimant, a houseman, testified that he was overworked. He presented no medical evidence, however, that the work was too arduous for him. Moreover, he also stated that he left his employment because he was going to Japan for a trip. Furthermore, he admitted that he did not complain to his employer that the work was too hard for him. Thus, substantial evidence supports the finding of the board. Decision affirmed, without costs. Koreman, P. J., Greenblott, Kane, Larkin and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

53 A.D.2d 711, 384 N.Y.S.2d 64, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13479, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-takaha-nyappdiv-1976.