In re the Claim of Stevenson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Stevenson

174 A.D.2d 920, 571 N.Y.S.2d 830, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9453

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 20, 1991

StatusPublished

This text of 174 A.D.2d 920 (In re the Claim of Stevenson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Stevenson, 174 A.D.2d 920, 571 N.Y.S.2d 830, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9453 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 25, 1990, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because she had insufficient weeks of covered employment.

Workers’ compensation benefits are not remuneration within the meaning of Labor Law § 517 (2) and weeks during which such payments are made do not constitute employment for the purpose of computing an employee’s base period (see, Matter of Luxenberg [Hartnett], 149 AD2d 778). Accordingly, the finding by the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant in this case was ineligible to file a valid original claim because she had insufficient weeks of covered employment in her base period (see, Labor Law § 527 [1], [2]) or in the six-month extended base period (see, Labor Law § 527 [3]) was rational and must be upheld (see, Matter of Luxenberg [Hart-nett], supra).

Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Weiss, Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 25, 1990, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because she had insufficient weeks of covered employment.

Workers’ compensation benefits are not remuneration within the meaning of Labor Law § 517 (2) and weeks during which such payments are made do not constitute employment for the purpose of computing an employee’s base period (see, Matter of Luxenberg [Hartnett], 149 AD2d 778). Accordingly, the finding by the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant in this case was ineligible to file a valid original claim because she had insufficient weeks of covered employment in her base period (see, Labor Law § 527 [1], [2]) or in the six-month extended base period (see, Labor Law § 527 [3]) was rational and must be upheld (see, Matter of Luxenberg [Hart-nett], supra).

Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Weiss, Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

174 A.D.2d 920, 571 N.Y.S.2d 830, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-stevenson-nyappdiv-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack