In re the Claim of Starr

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Starr

50 A.D.2d 961, 375 N.Y.S.2d 675, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11916

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 4, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 50 A.D.2d 961 (In re the Claim of Starr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Starr, 50 A.D.2d 961, 375 N.Y.S.2d 675, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11916 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 1, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining the initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits effective February 25, 1975 because she refused employment without good cause. The record establishes that claimant had refused referrals to prospective employers for jobs for which she was fitted by training and experience for personal reasons which were not compelling under the law. The board’s finding to that effect is supported by substantial evidence and must be affirmed (Matter of Drejza [Levine], 42 AD2d 659). In view of this conclusion by the board, it was unnecessary to decide the issue of unavailability. Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Koreman and Larkin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 1, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining the initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits effective February 25, 1975 because she refused employment without good cause. The record establishes that claimant had refused referrals to prospective employers for jobs for which she was fitted by training and experience for personal reasons which were not compelling under the law. The board’s finding to that effect is supported by substantial evidence and must be affirmed (Matter of Drejza [Levine], 42 AD2d 659). In view of this conclusion by the board, it was unnecessary to decide the issue of unavailability. Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Koreman and Larkin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.D.2d 961, 375 N.Y.S.2d 675, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11916, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-starr-nyappdiv-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack