In re the Claim of Spinelli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Spinelli

208 A.D.2d 1084, 617 N.Y.S.2d 554, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9779

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 20, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 208 A.D.2d 1084 (In re the Claim of Spinelli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Spinelli, 208 A.D.2d 1084, 617 N.Y.S.2d 554, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9779 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 26, 1993, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant worked as a service manager for the employer, a retail supermarket. The record indicates that claimant continued to allow minors to work hours forbidden by law after having been told by the employer not to do so. These facts provide sufficient evidence to support the Board’s finding of misconduct. We have considered claimant’s other arguments and find them to be without merit.

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, White and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 26, 1993, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant worked as a service manager for the employer, a retail supermarket. The record indicates that claimant continued to allow minors to work hours forbidden by law after having been told by the employer not to do so. These facts provide sufficient evidence to support the Board’s finding of misconduct. We have considered claimant’s other arguments and find them to be without merit.

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, White and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

208 A.D.2d 1084, 617 N.Y.S.2d 554, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9779, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-spinelli-nyappdiv-1994.