In re the Claim of Sperling
20 A.D.2d 584, 245 N.Y.S.2d 119, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2666
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 19, 1963·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
What constitutes “good cause” within the meaning of subdivision 1 of section 593 of the Labor Law is a question of fact and thus within the province of the board if its findings are supported by substantial evidence (Labor Law, § 623; Matter of Lipschitz [Lubin], 7 A D 2d 777). On the present record we find no reason to disturb the board’s determination. Decision unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present —Bergan, P. J., Gibson, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re the Claim of Sperling, 20 A.D.2d 584, 245 N.Y.S.2d 119, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2666 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).
20 A.D.2d 584 (In re the Claim of Sperling) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re the Claim of Robinson
379 N.E.2d 180 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)