Home/New York Court of Appeals/In re the Claim of Spack

In re the Claim of Spack

113 N.E.2d 150, 305 N.Y. 753, 1953 N.Y. LEXIS 1277
New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 22, 1953·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The finding that claimant refused employment without good cause was essentially one of fact, and, since there was substantial evidence to sustain it, and no error of law committed, the determination of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board should have been confirmed. (See, e.g., Matter of Humphrey v. State Ins. Fund, 298 N. Y. 327; see, also, Matter of Miller v. Kling, 291 N. Y. 65.)

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the determination of the Appeal Board reinstated, without costs.

Lewis, Ch. J., Conway, Desmond, Dye, Fuld and Feoessel, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Claim of Spack, 113 N.E.2d 150, 305 N.Y. 753, 1953 N.Y. LEXIS 1277 (N.Y. 1953).

113 N.E.2d 150 (In re the Claim of Spack) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Claim of Consentino
71 A.D.2d 1042 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
In re the Claim of Piech
50 A.D.2d 980 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)
Mtr. of Green (Republic Steel)
338 N.E.2d 594 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
In re the Claim of Hoffman
34 A.D.2d 871 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1970)
In re the Claim of Hernandez
33 A.D.2d 972 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1970)
In re the Claim of Russell
33 A.D.2d 592 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1969)
In re the Claim of Zimmermann
30 A.D.2d 454 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1968)
In re the Claim of Linker
27 A.D.2d 884 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1967)
In re the Claim of Schwartz
27 A.D.2d 617 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1966)