In re the Claim of Spack
This text of 113 N.E.2d 150 (In re the Claim of Spack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The finding that claimant refused employment without good cause was essentially one of fact, and, since there was substantial evidence to sustain it, and no error of law committed, the determination of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board should have been confirmed. (See, e.g., Matter of Humphrey v. State Ins. Fund, 298 N. Y. 327; see, also, Matter of Miller v. Kling, 291 N. Y. 65.)
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the determination of the Appeal Board reinstated, without costs.
Lewis, Ch. J., Conway, Desmond, Dye, Fuld and Feoessel, JJ., concur.
Order reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
113 N.E.2d 150, 305 N.Y. 753, 1953 N.Y. LEXIS 1277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-spack-ny-1953.