In re the Claim of Sonin

226 A.D.2d 790, 640 N.Y.S.2d 309, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3447
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 4, 1996·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Claimant was the president and sole shareholder of a corporation which exported audio software and sold children’s records and tapes to libraries and municipalities. After selling his business, claimant became unemployed. The Board denied his application for unemployment insurance benefits on the basis that he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Claimant challenges this determination, arguing that he was compelled to sell his business for financial reasons. Claimant testified at the hearing that he sold his business because it operated at a loss for two out of three years, it lost 40% of its export business and it was unable to timely pay vendors. He admitted, however, that he continued to receive a salary of approximately $69,000 and sold the business to another corporation for the net sum of $370,000. On the record before us, we find that substantial evidence supports the Board’s conclusion that claimant sold a viable business without a compelling reason and, therefore, voluntarily left his employment without good cause (cf., Matter of Gable [Roberts], 133 AD2d 484; Matter of Katz [Roberts], 123 AD2d 489).

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, White and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Claim of Sonin, 226 A.D.2d 790, 640 N.Y.S.2d 309, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3447 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

226 A.D.2d 790 (In re the Claim of Sonin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Rosen
9 A.D.3d 775 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
In re the Claim of Pitic
249 A.D.2d 671 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
In re the Claim of Williams
245 A.D.2d 947 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
In re the Claim of Joseph
241 A.D.2d 679 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
In re the Claim of Frisina
235 A.D.2d 887 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
In re the Claim of Tepper
228 A.D.2d 856 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)