In re the Claim of Slezak

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Slezak

252 A.D.2d 644, 675 N.Y.S.2d 202, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7984

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 2, 1998

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 252 A.D.2d 644 (In re the Claim of Slezak) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Slezak, 252 A.D.2d 644, 675 N.Y.S.2d 202, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7984 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 3, 1997, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

After 32 years of employment, claimant, a machinist, accepted the employer’s offer of an early retirement incentive package. The record establishes that continuing work was available to claimant and, given his 32 years of seniority, he could “bump” co-workers with less seniority even if his job was eliminated. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that claimant voluntarily left his job without good cause. Voluntary separation from one’s employment in order to accept an early retirement incentive package when continuing work is available has been held not to constitute good cause for leaving employment (see, Matter of Jaworski [Commissioner of Labor], 249 AD2d 869; Matter of Joseph [Sweeney], 246 AD2d 944). Inasmuch as substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision, it must be affirmed.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, White, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 3, 1997, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

After 32 years of employment, claimant, a machinist, accepted the employer’s offer of an early retirement incentive package. The record establishes that continuing work was available to claimant and, given his 32 years of seniority, he could “bump” co-workers with less seniority even if his job was eliminated. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that claimant voluntarily left his job without good cause. Voluntary separation from one’s employment in order to accept an early retirement incentive package when continuing work is available has been held not to constitute good cause for leaving employment (see, Matter of Jaworski [Commissioner of Labor], 249 AD2d 869; Matter of Joseph [Sweeney], 246 AD2d 944). Inasmuch as substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision, it must be affirmed.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, White, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

252 A.D.2d 644, 675 N.Y.S.2d 202, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7984, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-slezak-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack