In re the Claim of Sklar

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Sklar

50 A.D.2d 683, 375 N.Y.S.2d 420, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12522

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 20, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 50 A.D.2d 683 (In re the Claim of Sklar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Sklar, 50 A.D.2d 683, 375 N.Y.S.2d 420, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12522 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 2, 1975, which affirmed a referee’s decision that he was without jurisdiction to rule on an initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner, on the ground that claimant’s request for a hearing was untimely. The notices of initial determination of misconduct and ineligibility were mailed to claimant on September 20. Claimant did not request a hearing until he refiled his claim for benefits in February of 1975. The board was, therefore, without jurisdiction to decide the issue of claimant’s disqualification on the merits. Decision affirmed, without costs. Greenblott, J. P., Koreman, Main, Larkin and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 2, 1975, which affirmed a referee’s decision that he was without jurisdiction to rule on an initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner, on the ground that claimant’s request for a hearing was untimely. The notices of initial determination of misconduct and ineligibility were mailed to claimant on September 20. Claimant did not request a hearing until he refiled his claim for benefits in February of 1975. The board was, therefore, without jurisdiction to decide the issue of claimant’s disqualification on the merits. Decision affirmed, without costs. Greenblott, J. P., Koreman, Main, Larkin and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.D.2d 683, 375 N.Y.S.2d 420, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12522, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-sklar-nyappdiv-1975.