In re the Claim of Sisto

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Sisto

50 A.D.2d 701, 375 N.Y.S.2d 444, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12561

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 26, 1975

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 50 A.D.2d 701 (In re the Claim of Sisto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Sisto, 50 A.D.2d 701, 375 N.Y.S.2d 444, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12561 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 3, 1974, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining an initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits on the ground that she voluntarily left her employment to follow her spouse to another locality. Claimant quit her job to move to Florida with her husband who had a heart condition. The board found that claimant’s presence in Florida was not required to render special care to her husband. There is substantial proof in the record to sustain the board’s determination that claimant left her employment voluntarily to follow her spouse to another location. The decision, therefore, is affirmed (Matter of Di Salvo [Catherwoodj 30 AD2d 755). Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Sweeney, Koreman, Larkin and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 3, 1974, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining an initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits on the ground that she voluntarily left her employment to follow her spouse to another locality. Claimant quit her job to move to Florida with her husband who had a heart condition. The board found that claimant’s presence in Florida was not required to render special care to her husband. There is substantial proof in the record to sustain the board’s determination that claimant left her employment voluntarily to follow her spouse to another location. The decision, therefore, is affirmed (Matter of Di Salvo [Catherwoodj 30 AD2d 755). Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Sweeney, Koreman, Larkin and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.D.2d 701, 375 N.Y.S.2d 444, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12561, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-sisto-nyappdiv-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack