In re the Claim of Sincerbox

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Sincerbox

24 A.D.2d 811, 263 N.Y.S.2d 907, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6994

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 29, 1965

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 24 A.D.2d 811 (In re the Claim of Sincerbox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Sincerbox, 24 A.D.2d 811, 263 N.Y.S.2d 907, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6994 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Herlihy, J.

Claimant appeals from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board denying him benefits. The claimant, a retired salesman, was serving as foreman of a Federal Grand Jury for three days a week and was unable to obtain employment during that period on a part-time basis. The board found that as foreman, he could not be excused from his Grand Jury duties and that, accordingly, he was not available for employment during that period. The circumstances, somewhat unusual, presented a factual issue and there is substantial evidence in the present record to sustain the determination. Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Reynolds, Taylor and Hamm, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Herlihy, J.

Claimant appeals from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board denying him benefits. The claimant, a retired salesman, was serving as foreman of a Federal Grand Jury for three days a week and was unable to obtain employment during that period on a part-time basis. The board found that as foreman, he could not be excused from his Grand Jury duties and that, accordingly, he was not available for employment during that period. The circumstances, somewhat unusual, presented a factual issue and there is substantial evidence in the present record to sustain the determination. Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Reynolds, Taylor and Hamm, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 A.D.2d 811, 263 N.Y.S.2d 907, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6994, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-sincerbox-nyappdiv-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack