In re the Claim of Sincerbox

24 A.D.2d 811, 263 N.Y.S.2d 907, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6994
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 29, 1965·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Herlihy, J.

Claimant appeals from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board denying him benefits. The claimant, a retired salesman, was serving as foreman of a Federal Grand Jury for three days a week and was unable to obtain employment during that period on a part-time basis. The board found that as foreman, he could not be excused from his Grand Jury duties and that, accordingly, he was not available for employment during that period. The circumstances, somewhat unusual, presented a factual issue and there is substantial evidence in the present record to sustain the determination. Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Reynolds, Taylor and Hamm, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Claim of Sincerbox, 24 A.D.2d 811, 263 N.Y.S.2d 907, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6994 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

24 A.D.2d 811 (In re the Claim of Sincerbox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Claim of King
51 A.D.2d 605 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)