In re the Claim of Simson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Simson

18 A.D.2d 744, 235 N.Y.S.2d 588, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6183

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 28, 1962

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 18 A.D.2d 744 (In re the Claim of Simson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Simson, 18 A.D.2d 744, 235 N.Y.S.2d 588, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6183 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

This is an appeal by the claimant from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which determined she was disqualified from benefits on the ground she had voluntarily left her employment without good cause. The claimant states the issue as “Did I quit my job or was I fired?” From the record it appears that the claimant might have misunderstood the events of the day that she left her employment and thought she was fired. To the contrary, there is other testimony and statements in the record that she quit her job because of dissatisfaction over pay raises. This factual dispute was decided by the board and we cannot disturb such finding. (Matter of Genza [Catherwood], 16 A D 2d 997.) Decision unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Bergan, P. J., Gibson, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ.'

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This is an appeal by the claimant from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which determined she was disqualified from benefits on the ground she had voluntarily left her employment without good cause. The claimant states the issue as “Did I quit my job or was I fired?” From the record it appears that the claimant might have misunderstood the events of the day that she left her employment and thought she was fired. To the contrary, there is other testimony and statements in the record that she quit her job because of dissatisfaction over pay raises. This factual dispute was decided by the board and we cannot disturb such finding. (Matter of Genza [Catherwood], 16 A D 2d 997.) Decision unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Bergan, P. J., Gibson, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ.'

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 A.D.2d 744, 235 N.Y.S.2d 588, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6183, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-simson-nyappdiv-1962.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack