Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re the Claim of Sillan

In re the Claim of Sillan

53 A.D.2d 719, 384 N.Y.S.2d 58
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 3, 1976
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 53 A.D.2d 719 (In re the Claim of Sillan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Claim of Sillan, 53 A.D.2d 719, 384 N.Y.S.2d 58 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 18, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining an initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits on the ground he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. The board has found that the -claimant resigned his employment voluntarily and for personal, noncompelling reasons. The record provides substantial evidence to support its determination (Matter of Silver [Levine], 50 AD2d 639). Decision affirmed, without costs. Koreman, P. J., Greenblott, Kane, Larkin and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Claim of Knox
195 A.D.2d 732 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
In re the Claim of Montgomery
194 A.D.2d 1041 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
In re the Claim of Sarpolis
194 A.D.2d 1052 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
In re the Claim of David
193 A.D.2d 995 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
In re Mattia
192 A.D.2d 1047 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
In re the Claim of Schell
192 A.D.2d 1007 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
In re the Claim of Romero
190 A.D.2d 925 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
In re the Claim of Bradley
190 A.D.2d 949 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
In re the Claim of Koushakjian
190 A.D.2d 938 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
In re the Claim of Etheridge
184 A.D.2d 886 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
In re the Claim of Sawastynowicz
182 A.D.2d 926 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
In re the Claim of Alhadeff
179 A.D.2d 858 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
In re the Claim of De Carlo
179 A.D.2d 859 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
In re the Claim of Ollinger
176 A.D.2d 433 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
53 A.D.2d 719, 384 N.Y.S.2d 58, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-sillan-nyappdiv-1976.