In re the Claim of Sheridan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Sheridan

52 A.D.2d 966, 382 N.Y.S.2d 860, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12839

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 6, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 52 A.D.2d 966 (In re the Claim of Sheridan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Sheridan, 52 A.D.2d 966, 382 N.Y.S.2d 860, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12839 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal'Board, filed October 15, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining an initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner holding claimant ineligible to receive benefits for the period of May 5, 1975 through June 9, 1975 because he was not totally [967]*967unemployed and further holding that claimant was unavailable for employment effective June 10, 1975. The claimant conceded that for the period of May 5 to June 9, 1975 he was self-employed. At the hearing he asserted that he had made various job contacts by telephone or mail, however, his credibility and the adequacy of his job efforts were questions of fact for the board and its decision is supported by substantial evidence. Decision affirmed, without costs. Kane, J. P., Mahoney, Main, Larkin and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal'Board, filed October 15, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining an initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner holding claimant ineligible to receive benefits for the period of May 5, 1975 through June 9, 1975 because he was not totally [967]*967unemployed and further holding that claimant was unavailable for employment effective June 10, 1975. The claimant conceded that for the period of May 5 to June 9, 1975 he was self-employed. At the hearing he asserted that he had made various job contacts by telephone or mail, however, his credibility and the adequacy of his job efforts were questions of fact for the board and its decision is supported by substantial evidence. Decision affirmed, without costs. Kane, J. P., Mahoney, Main, Larkin and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 A.D.2d 966, 382 N.Y.S.2d 860, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12839, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-sheridan-nyappdiv-1976.