In re the Claim of Shaw
158 N.E.2d 128, 5 N.Y.2d 1014, 185 N.Y.S.2d 267, 1959 N.Y. LEXIS 1507
This text of 158 N.E.2d 128 (In re the Claim of Shaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re the Claim of Shaw, 158 N.E.2d 128, 5 N.Y.2d 1014, 185 N.Y.S.2d 267, 1959 N.Y. LEXIS 1507 (N.Y. 1959).
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs to claimant-respondent; no opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Conway and Judges Desmond, Dye, Ftjld and Burke. Judges Froessel and Van Voorhis dissent and vote to reverse for the reasons stated by Herlihy, J., in his dissenting opinion in the Appellate Division.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In re the Claim of Nonnon
74 A.D.2d 943 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Murphy v. Fascio
340 A.2d 137 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1975)
In re the Claim of Fleischmann
43 A.D.2d 624 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1973)
Raytheon Co. v. DIRECTOR OF DIVISION OF EMP. SECURITY
182 N.E.2d 293 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1962)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
158 N.E.2d 128, 5 N.Y.2d 1014, 185 N.Y.S.2d 267, 1959 N.Y. LEXIS 1507, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-shaw-ny-1959.