In re the Claim of Schonwald

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Schonwald

25 A.D.2d 461, 266 N.Y.S.2d 180, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5176

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 13, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 25 A.D.2d 461 (In re the Claim of Schonwald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Schonwald, 25 A.D.2d 461, 266 N.Y.S.2d 180, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5176 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Herlihy, J.

Claim[462]*462ant appeals from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which denied benefits on the grounds that she failed to comply with reporting requirements and made willful misrepresentations. The board found that the date of October 3 on an insurance record card had been changed to October 30. The factual issue was determined against the claimant and albeit she denied the alteration the question of credibility, the issue argued by claimant, was one within the exclusive province of the board. (See Matter of Vick [Catherwood], 12 A D 2d 120.) Decision affirmed, without costs.

Gibson, P. J., Reynolds, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Herlihy, J.

Claim[462]*462ant appeals from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which denied benefits on the grounds that she failed to comply with reporting requirements and made willful misrepresentations. The board found that the date of October 3 on an insurance record card had been changed to October 30. The factual issue was determined against the claimant and albeit she denied the alteration the question of credibility, the issue argued by claimant, was one within the exclusive province of the board. (See Matter of Vick [Catherwood], 12 A D 2d 120.) Decision affirmed, without costs.

Gibson, P. J., Reynolds, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 A.D.2d 461, 266 N.Y.S.2d 180, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-schonwald-nyappdiv-1966.