In re the Claim of Schneiderman

49 A.D.2d 779, 372 N.Y.S.2d 270, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10800
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 18, 1975·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 16, 1975, which rescinded its decision of October 3, 1973 and disqualified claimant from receiving benefits because he lost his employment through misconduct. There is substantial evidence in the record to sustain the board’s finding of misconduct based on the proof that claimant left his work early without permission after having been previously warned that his attendance record would have to improve or disciplinary action would be taken. In light of Matter of James (Levine) (34 NY2d 491), we are not persuaded by claimant’s contention that there is no basis for the board’s rescinding its prior decision of no misconduct. Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Kane and Main, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Claim of Schneiderman, 49 A.D.2d 779, 372 N.Y.S.2d 270, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10800 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

49 A.D.2d 779 (In re the Claim of Schneiderman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Claim of Shelton
180 A.D.2d 997 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
In re the Claim of DiGeronimo
53 A.D.2d 797 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)