In re the Claim of Schneider

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Schneider

201 A.D.2d 811, 607 N.Y.S.2d 501, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1142

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 10, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 201 A.D.2d 811 (In re the Claim of Schneider) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Schneider, 201 A.D.2d 811, 607 N.Y.S.2d 501, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1142 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 15, 1993, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

There is substantial evidence to support the Board’s conclusion that claimant was guilty of misconduct. Testimony indicated that he used insubordinate and vulgar language to his employer’s assistant principal. Furthermore, the incident took place while claimant was helping out in the lunchroom in the presence of students. Claimant had also been warned in the past about insubordination. Claimant’s arguments to the contrary raise questions of credibility which were for the Board to resolve. His procedural arguments concerning the conduct of his hearing have been examined and rejected as lacking in merit.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 15, 1993, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

There is substantial evidence to support the Board’s conclusion that claimant was guilty of misconduct. Testimony indicated that he used insubordinate and vulgar language to his employer’s assistant principal. Furthermore, the incident took place while claimant was helping out in the lunchroom in the presence of students. Claimant had also been warned in the past about insubordination. Claimant’s arguments to the contrary raise questions of credibility which were for the Board to resolve. His procedural arguments concerning the conduct of his hearing have been examined and rejected as lacking in merit.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

201 A.D.2d 811, 607 N.Y.S.2d 501, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-schneider-nyappdiv-1994.