In re the Claim of Schneider

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Schneider

50 A.D.2d 631, 374 N.Y.S.2d 755, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12442

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 6, 1975

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 50 A.D.2d 631 (In re the Claim of Schneider) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Schneider, 50 A.D.2d 631, 374 N.Y.S.2d 755, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12442 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 20, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining an initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner holding claimant ineligible to receive benefits effective November 11, 1974 because he was not totally unemployed. Claimant has been granted disability retirement and seeks employment in other fields. He has been spending substantial time in a self-employment venture which he hopes will ultimately establish him as a writer in his field. One engaged in self-employment activities is not totally unemployed and is ineligible for benefits (Matter of Schatzberg [Catherwood], 32 AD2d 710). Furthermore, if the efforts are designed to produce eventual profit, the fact that no immediate remuneration is produced would not render claimant eligible for benefits (Matter of Carasso [Catherwood] 23 AD2d 935; Matter of Bailey [Catherwood] 18 AD2d 727). Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Koreman and Larkin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 20, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining an initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner holding claimant ineligible to receive benefits effective November 11, 1974 because he was not totally unemployed. Claimant has been granted disability retirement and seeks employment in other fields. He has been spending substantial time in a self-employment venture which he hopes will ultimately establish him as a writer in his field. One engaged in self-employment activities is not totally unemployed and is ineligible for benefits (Matter of Schatzberg [Catherwood], 32 AD2d 710). Furthermore, if the efforts are designed to produce eventual profit, the fact that no immediate remuneration is produced would not render claimant eligible for benefits (Matter of Carasso [Catherwood] 23 AD2d 935; Matter of Bailey [Catherwood] 18 AD2d 727). Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Koreman and Larkin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.D.2d 631, 374 N.Y.S.2d 755, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-schneider-nyappdiv-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack